My mouth speaks what is true,
For my lips detest wickedness.
All the words of my mouth are
just;
Not one of them is crooked or
perverse.
-
Wisdom, in the eighth chapter of
Proverbs
Gather 'round, all you clowns,
let me hear you say...
- From "You've Got to Hide Your Love Away" |

This song by the Beatles
tells of a man's visceral response to a girlfriend's
rejection. The reason it is so meaningful to me is
how much I really want to love others, but wow, is
it hard. Even more than that, when you reach out
sharing authentically true and just and just truly
true things, just because you know it may just help
people understand things better, people don't want
to hear it. "Go away with that, it is scary.
You've got to hide your love away."
I know so well. I'm a teacher, I've been one for
a little over 30 years now, and I've taught mostly secondary school
Civics and Economics in
both public and private settings. Dozens of quite
sobering events have occurred in my
professional career,
some of which involve experiences sharing starkly truthful things with
my students, even biblically truthful things
in private Christian schools, and
I've been severely reprimanded and summarily dismissed
as a result of all of them —
even from the Christian schools, three different such
institutions. I've been gracious and respectful in
every single one of them, with
every student, parent, and administrator, in every
single interaction whether in the classroom or
administrative office.
Still...
Much of why I've been so savaged simply relates to the very few viciously vocal parents who protested biblically
truthful things shared in a classroom. They are
intractably captivated by the humanist, materialist, globalist,
socialist, racialist, sodomist, and yes, atheist
agenda woven into the mainstream — not unlike the
yeast of the Pharisees Jesus warned about. I could
mention several specific things about this reality and how much
it is now steeped in society today. All I want to
ask at this point is a question that I've sought to
answer quite comprehensively in this webzine effort.
How did all of that get there?
I find it interesting how people like to celebrate
anniversaries, especially those with year lengths
ending in "0." I've noted that Disney always
goes crazy with it, and this year is the 100th
anniversary of the whole Disney enterprise, what
with Walt officially starting the company in 1923
showcasing Oswald Rabbit for a bit
and introducing Mickey Mouse in "Steamboat Willie" just five years
later.
Parenthetically as you may well know, this 100 years
later the Disney company is reeling from allowing
itself to be so consumed by the abject ugliness of
that yeast, this virulent "woke" dominion that has
infected what was once an institution that took pride in being
pretty morally wholesome. Now the discomforting
erotica and occultism elements Disney elevates are
just too pronounced — in its films, in its parks, in
its entire company milieu.
All of society is smothered in it.
Again, the question, how did all of this get
there?
So then in honor of Disney's 100th, how about this year we celebrate one of the
most important years ever in world history? The
250th anniversary? Lessee, 250 years ago is, umm, 1773? Ah yes,
definitely
the year of the Boston Tea Party! That's a really
good guess, it did happen in December of that year,
but no, that's not it. Lessee, there was a modest Ottoman revolt during the
Russo-Turkish War, but nah, that's not it either.
The introduction of the Viennese waltz that year! Uh, yeah, no...
Something much more significant.
It was the official Disestablishment of the Jesuit Order by
the Roman Catholic Church, July 21 to be exact, by
order of the Pope in the Dominus ac Redemptor
Noster. This is Latin for "Our Lord and
Redeemer," in a most twisted way telling the Jesuits
"We want to be free from you insisting everyone bow
to the Pope." The more standard reasons were
that the Order simply did too much subversively
sneaky political meddling, it featured all kinds of
icky esoteric rituals, and its members were just too
danged clever for their own good!
As much as everyone thought they were free from its
grip, all of this was perfectly fine for Jesuits
because now being non-existent they could more
easily compel their subjects to do their
bidding under the conviction they didn't have to
believe anyone but themselves — never mind
whatever the "self" was saying was fed to them
by these World Ops now driven into a very
comfortable obscurity.
Long before the Disestablishment many countries had
already kicked them out, and the Church was
pressured by the vox populi to
just do away with the whole thing. I mean, it did
seem 1773 was the height of dread among American
colonists over the threat of an Anglican bishop
coming across the Atlantic to start busting
parishioners' balls, indeed busting those of
any religious persuasion. How about we just put
everyone's fears to rest and tell everyone that
terribly bothersome papist army is no more! Have
some fireworks and flag-waving and barbeque
—
let's go!
We're free from all that! FREEDOM RULES!
Huh, how come
there are still Jesuits around?
After a few years of this faux elimination,
the Church realized too many
people were enjoying a bit too much freedom of
conscience, and, well, there was this Protestant
thing weaving its way through Europe, so it needed
the services of the smartest guys in the room. In
their phenomenal ingenuity, the Jesuits moved the
Church to do what all good healthy rackets do,
make each nation an offer it could not refuse.
A century earlier the Jesuits quite publically went crazy with their policy
of Ultramontanism, the demanding of papal
obedience by everyone. I believe they deliberately
marketed it with such vigor implicitly to generate
the desired antipathy. Makes sense, after all,
people say they want freedom,
but they just want someone very powerful to let them
do what they want and squash anyone who gets in
their way. The Church is just a stodgy moralistic
killjoy. We really like the grand performance art
every Sunday, but don't be all judgmental about
things unless you're beaming about how marvelous I
am.
In the mid-1700s the policy of Gallicanism
started winning the day, with the
European monarchs whining about not getting their
measure of power. So of course they went to the
Church to ask
permission. Eventually the Church said, "Well,
okaay, we'll let you do this and that, but you
still have to do this and this and this we
still get to do." Deal! As much as those countries
thought they were all that, the Church still
dominated.
The Jesuits were needed to make all of this work, so
sure enough, in 1814 the Disestablishment ended and
the Order was re-established — huh, that
sure didn't last long. Of course much of this was
because after Napoleon was giving the Pope a really
bad time the Pope went squawking to those deft enough to
help him out — the timing couldn't have been more
ideal with Waterloo convincing Napoleon it'd be good
to head off to his nice
retirement digs at St. Helena.
But again, all this would only work if potentates
could make everyone believe their rulership
would offer their subjects all those things they wanted
particularly that thing freedom. In fact it
is kind of funny that in Russia the Jesuits were not
disestablished at all! Catherine the Great thought
them delightful, and even assigned them their own
Superior General. After all, the Jesuits were
educating their people, they were super nice to
everyone, and they were successfully
using their exploitive political machinations to
ensure compliance of the citizenry.
The Jesuit
suppression/restoration jig is
merely a necessarily intricate part of the much more
interminably lethal
chic-authoritarian/heroic-anarchist dance. Indeed
the whole marathon ballroom competition is the
Order's very raison d'etre. Countries
have had this love/hate relationship with these guys
for centuries, as they have with any of the
deepest-state ops who must carry out the quite often
exceedingly gruesome business of effective governance if any
potentate is going to succeed. The Jesuits were
jettisoned from a number of countries again around
the time of the Revolution of 1848, which only tells
us that people rage and rant and holler about the feeling
they aren't getting enough freedom and
democracy and limited government and
they simply must convulsively enjoy a violent bitchfest about it for
about the 87-thousandth time in all of history. Then again they only actually want their
chosen leader-bully to crack heads on their behalf —
and yes, it requires those with the skill of a
Jesuit to make that happen.
I believe the last country to officially have some
kind of official declaration that the Jesuits stay
away was Norway, which ended that
disestablishment as late as 1956! It is truly Jesuit
genius, really: Get people to be more faithful to
Rome by making them believe they were not
doing anything Rome wanted them to do.
Interestingly Ultramontanism got its most impressive
traction in the late 1800s, until the movement fell
out of favor leaving much of the world as Catholicized as ever.
Notch another major victory for the Company men.
The Re-establishment of the Order and along with it all the Jesuit designs
for the bestest nicest global hegemony has always
come with the idea that those Jesuits are necessary
because of their educational acumen. This has
always kept them in good favor, so much so that
today just about every institution of higher
education is overrun by the humanist materialist
dogma. I kind of liken it to tech
companies now doing the same thing, but getting all
the cred they need because they promise utopia through its
"A.I."
Jesuit Order: "You can never really take us out because we're
teaching your kids math and writing!"
Meta Apple Microsoft
Alphabet Amazon: "You can never really take us out because we've
started to get the 'A.I.' going real good!"
What is and always has been bilged into the pedagogical
mainstream, however, is not rigorous, righteous,
Bible-based instruction. Instead it is strictly
secular and fiercely anti-clericalist
Epicureanism ultimately leading to the codified
substance of the preeminent civil religion to which every good
Catholicist belongs:
Moralist Therapeutic Deism. Moralist ("I'm really a good
person!") Therapeutic ("Somebody make
me feel good!") Deism ("God really has
nothing to do with anything, much less me.") It
has been around for millennia, each
generation has some variation of it, and it is
always the World System's ministerial showcase managed
by those in the Order.
It is simple: You can't have potentates do potentate
things without the populace expressing their
freedom and doing the most wickedly immoral
things with some kind of faintly promised impunity. All the latest,
trendiest, more imaginative gyrations related to all
of this originate here... well, perhaps in a place
a bit lower than the Gesu. The mighty twin towers of
academia and media provide the exhilarating service
of robust dissemination, and while thoughtful people
through the ages have been justifiably concerned
about what those World System deep-ops do they are either
resigned to it or just plain
celebrate what they authoritatively must do as
Cain's Legacy.
As always, all of it leads to death. Every bit of
it. That is the whole point.
Last week a tragic incident nearby was a terrific example
of the product of all of this.
A police standoff with a gentleman served with a
warrant at his house lasted all afternoon and ended
in a fiery inferno during which the man was shot
dead while trying to escape. This kind of thing
always brings up the why why WHY? questions.
If you even modestly peruse Scripture you'd know. It
was shared quite succinctly by Benjamin Franklin
actually, in one of his most profound aphorisms.
"Nine men in ten are suicides."
All the Order needs to do is tinker with the innate
evildoing within the political and social
infrastructure and you get men prosecuting
themselves. Sure it is a tremendously grisly
operation, but that is part of the genius of the
Jesuit's exquisitely Sun-Tzuan enterprise. Get it to look quite sweet
and luscious, because if you aren't going to
live by the precepts of Christ and Gospel, then
you've got to live by the ways of The City.
It is either Christ or Rome. Kingdom or World. Life
or Death. Rome has hundreds of
spiffy Jesuses, and Jesuits are experts at
making them — they are after all The Society of Jesus.
Every person on the planet believes in
some form of
any one of them. Go further and you'll
often catch
the most observant and strident detractor
speak about the Bilderbergers or the Skull & Bonesmen or
the WEF Great Reseters or the George Soros people or the highest ivory-tower bankers funding both sides and
on and on
ad nauseam, or you'll soak up the revulsion
of those who can't stand seeing things out there
that just plain get in the way of their
CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOM, or you hear from the
pulpit ministers who rail against some kind of
devil-worshipping thing or
nasty apostate thing or some kind of weird churchy
thing they don't like — ::ho-hum::...
They don't get it. Very few of them do.
Every one of those things is just another Jesus Rome
has invented and showcased for you to either revile
or embrace. Any kind of obsession with them is a
form of worship and as such idolatry. Roiling and
resisting and rebelling against any
of them is just as much a part of the gourmet banquet they gorge upon.
The only thing one may do from the Kingdom is to
sorrowfully gaze upon it and keenly understand what
God is doing with it, a truly harrowing desolation that, again, must happen.
It shouldn't, but God allows it as an act of mercy
so we can behold the consequences of our sin,
otherwise we wouldn't grasp the significance of His
perfect judgment and even more the meaning of His
bountiful mercy.
The Kingdom dweller may then humbly but boldly
invite those who want
out by encouraging them to leave all of those things
behind and accept the
abundantly gracious offer of Christ Who with nail-scarred hands stands at the skinny,
splintery, blood-stained old door to Real
Freedom — the only way in.
This is the reason I mentioned hiding your love away,
there at the beginning of this piece. Love is hard.
In fact the only way one can love is by doing it the
way the Only One Who Can Truly Love does it.
It requires a life-giving God to do it.
As I've shared before, I'm so drawn to Jeremiah. He
so much wanted to tell people about that God. He so
valued His commission by God Himself to do so, but
it was hard. He loved people who
shunned him and wanted another Jesus
who'd commend them for their Moralistic Therapeutic
Deism — they wanted Egypt, where they felt that
could get that.
Jeremiah said wait, no, don't do that, God will care for you. They didn't
want that. Off on their own they got death.
Jeremiah, meanwhile, got dropped in a
deep pit. Literally, a pit in the
ground, left there to die.
Ironically there was a public official who somehow,
someway respected his own law and knew this was
wrong. Maybe it was God inspired — maybe he just
had something of an appreciation for the truth
Jeremiah was sharing — Ebedmelech was his name,
mercifully pulling Jeremiah from that pit. Again, God was
using the distressing things around as a footstool
for His purposes.
But I can't imagine Jeremiah didn't still want to
visit that lodge — to hang out and hash out
bountifully meaningful Heaven things with good,
wise, thoughtful Kingdom compatriots.
Deep in the wilderness far away from all the World
ugliness.
No worries. It'll come on the Last Day. We'll get to
be there. Until then, we journey with the faithful,
millions of them, who came before.
From the eleventh chapter of the letter to the
Hebrews: "God having provided something better for
us, that they should not be made perfect apart from
us..."
***
Final note: There is so much more to the history of
Jesuit machinations, much more than a very modest
home page piece can cover. I am blessed to read and
discover from those who bravely put it all down,
particularly those followers of Christ in the 19th
century who truly identified who the Jesuits were
and what they were doing. Now that material is
exceedingly hard to find, it has in many ways been
profoundly "shadow banned" because the image of
Jesuits as nice smiley college professors who are
the only ones who really like you has been so
propagated that to bring any of it up is to
compromise their sworn activity in running World
political affairs. Of course with very few grasping
these truths the Order doesn't have to do much.
I have been immersed in reading as much of it as I
can, and wow, there is a surprising amount of it in
just regular reliable accounts
— it's there
if
you just look. There
were a dozen other things I'd have loved to have
added; maybe I will in future
writing efforts. The historically veritable material
is there
— as I usually do I heartily encourage to read Tupper
Saussy's
Rulers of Evil. Think you know all
that went into the establishment of our beloved
U.S.of A? Even Tupper couldn't get into all of it. But again, being
fully engaged in the current education world it is
easy to see why very few know about it. No one
wants to really look. Young people in
particular simply don't have a clue, and don't seem
to care to.
Any official disestablishment of the Jesuit Order?
Silly. Don't need one. It is already in place by
default, and again, that is perfectly fine with
them. That they are now doing everything they did
before 1773, after 1814, and every other time is a
testament to their brilliance. In fact because so
many don't give a rip about it but still do
the wretched things they do is plain evidence of it.
One last thing that should be noted. Over the
entirety of my teaching career I
never shared a single definitively Catholicist Nation item in the
classroom. The only time Rome was addressed was in
the most clinically acceptable way. Even so, the
things I graciously and respectfully shared in the
classroom
— mostly just things like marriage is only between a
man and woman and pre-born babies are full human
beings
—
were unacceptable to those whose
administrative duties must be regulated by those
authoritative operatives. Excommunication is not
fun, but it has been a God-thing since I may better
grasp what happened and share those things with someone who
may come across this and learn a bit more about The
Kingdom.
***
Notes:
-
I've been quite
transparent in this
piece regarding my
professional life. Some
may wonder if there are
any other considerations
that led to my
rejections, and there is
certainly more to it
all. But the substance
of what happened is
precisely as I shared
it here. If there be
something amiss in my
assessment I can only
say that God is my judge
and that is very good. I
do plan to assemble
something of a polemic
hopefully without too
much self-absorption,
perhaps in future blog
posts or even on a page
here in the webzine. (In
fact, here on December 3
as I jot down this added
note,
I did put up a blog post
with just a small take on
this very thing.)
-
The images of Asha are
screenshots from Disney's
latest animated feature
Wish, which,
I've been told, has
performed at the box
office just as miserably
as all of its other
latest offerings. I
can't help but wonder
about the unusual lead
character's name, as it
is very similar to Achsa
Sprague, one of the most
celebrated spiritualist
mediums of the mid-1800s.
-
The
image of the gentlemen
preparing his next
classroom lesson is the
founder of the Jesuit
Order, Ignatius Loyola.
-
"A.I." is in quotes
because not only does
the thing Artificial
Intelligence not
exist and never will,
but it is yet another
insidious ruse of the
System to convince
people it does.
One of my recent home
page pieces got into
it a bit more.
-
Ultramontanism
came from the phrase
"beyond the mountains,"
meaning France and other
European countries
were expected to look beyond
the Alps to Rome for
full
governance of their
affairs. Gallicanism
originates from the
Roman term for France,
"Gaul." It was
instrumental in
ultimately shaping the
federal system of
government now
prevailing in most
industrialized countries
today.
-
Here I've frequently put
the word freedom
in italics simply
because it is something
many firmly believe it
is something when it
isn't really. In a sense
there is a World
"freedom" and a Kingdom
freedom. I'm convinced
biblically the only
freedom there is is in
Christ. All other
freedoms are ultimately
fantasies. "Freedom of
this" or
"Freedom of that"
are just forms of
sophisticated
dissembling to allow
Rome to tighten its grip
on the behavior of World
devotees. Obviously this
is a really extensive
subject requiring
volumes of discourse to
address. Many trees have
been felled so far to
put all the words about
it onto paper already.
-
I've shared a number of
things about the
sinister character of
Epicureanism. They are
here,
here, and
here.
-
The term Moralistic
Therapeutic Deism
was one proposed a few
years ago by a Christian
writer who did
accurately define it as
the prominent civil
religion of our day. The
main thrust of this home
page piece is that it
was indeed designed,
arranged, and
implemented by Rome, and
it is still sustained by
its World Ops through
its dominion over
academia and media.
-
While all legitimately
ruling potentates must
signify their authority
and you can find out
what their deepest-state
operatives are doing if
you look closely enough,
the very best place to
see it is in Scripture
itself. The
establishment of the
World System is
described quite
succinctly in the fourth
chapter of Genesis.
-
The episode with the
people going to Egypt
against God's
instructions is in
chapters 42 to 44 of
Jeremiah. The episode
with Ebedmelech is in
the 38th chapter. In
that same chapter
shortly after that Jeremiah and his
truthful words were
further disrespected
when he told the king to
let Babylon take over
for now. I was reminded
of this in
today's (December 3)
entry in my devotional
book. I love that
God shared this with us
right after He blessed
me with sharing this
home page piece.
-
I have delved into quite
a bit of history here,
and if I have not
faithfully represented
that history, I'd be
happy
to know about it. I
want to be a accurate as
I can with my
exposition.
-
Here
are a few thoughts about The One
Who Delivers from the Harrowing
Desolation of the World.
|
All photographs inserted were taken from
the web unless otherwise noted. Forgive me if I have not included attributions.
I make no money directly from this web
effort.
Thanks nonetheless to those who posted
them so I may reproduce them here.
Thank you.
_________________________________________________________________________